What Is Meant By Grammatical Agreement
An agreement based on grammatical numbers can be made between verb and subject, as in the case of the grammatical person discussed above. In fact, the two categories are often mixed in conjugation patterns: there are specific forms of verbs for the first-person singular, the second plural, etc. A few examples: the isolation of the list of works that, in a given field or subsector, should be considered “fundamental”, is clearly a highly subjective issue for which it may be difficult (if not impossible) to reach consensus; however, these works, hopefully, will put, if not all works on agreement, that would merit such a name (see also Chomsky 2000 and Chomsky 2001, both cited as test-goal). Moravcsik 1978 is a groundbreaking typological study of the conformity of a large typological sample. George and Kornfilt in 1981, Fassi Fehri in 1988, Bobaljik in 1995, Chung in 1998 and Rackowski and Richards 2005 are supposed to be case studies on agreement in certain languages (or language families), but they have proven to be very influential and important for the development of the theory of concordance in general. In 1997, research on uniqueness in the language of adults and the study of language learning. Anagnostopoulou 2003 is an innovative case study on how agreement (and climate doubling) can help to understand the syntax of a given construction, in this case the verb ditransity. Wechsler and Zlati`2003 represent a theory of adequacy that lies in the grammar of the head-controlled sentence structure (HPSG) and lexical-functional grammar (LFG), paying particular attention to discursium phenomena and the resolution of chords in coordinations. In Hungarian, verbs have a polypersonal concordance, which means that they correspond to more than one of the arguments of the verb: not only its subject, but also its object (accusative). There is a difference between the case where a particular object is present and the case where the object is indeterminate or if there is no object at all. (Adverbs have no influence on the form of the verb.) Examples: Szeretek (I love someone or something indeterminate), szeretem (I love him, she, or her, or her, specifically), szeretlek (I love you); szeret (he loves me, me, you, someone or something indeterminate), szereti (he loves him, her or her especially). Of course, names or pronouns can specify the exact object. In short, there is agreement between a verb and the person and the number of its subject and the specificity of its object (which often refers more or less precisely to the person).
In this example, it is not a prefix that is copied, but the orif. This document is an innovative work on Turkish syntax in general and contains some of the first detailed formal analyses of the agreement in the nominal field.